Titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) vs Inconel 718: Complete Comparison
Compare Ti-6Al-4V (Grade 5) vs Inconel 718 for CNC machining. Mechanical properties, temperature resistance, cost, machinability, and application recommendations for aerospace and high-temperature components.
Quick Answer
Choose Ti-6Al-4V for lightweight structural applications requiring high strength-to-weight ratio and corrosion resistance up to 400°C. Choose Inconel 718 for extreme-temperature applications up to 700°C where oxidation and creep resistance are critical. Ti-6Al-4V is lighter (4.43 vs 8.19 g/cm³) and easier to machine; Inconel 718 maintains strength at higher temperatures.
Quick Answer
Choose Ti-6Al-4V for lightweight structural applications (density 4.43 vs 8.19 g/cm³) with service temperatures up to 400°C. Choose Inconel 718 for extreme-temperature environments up to 700°C. Ti-6Al-4V is significantly easier to machine; Inconel 718 costs more and requires specialized tooling.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Property | Ti-6Al-4V (Grade 5) | Inconel 718 |
|---|---|---|
| Density | 4.43 g/cm³ | 8.19 g/cm³ |
| Ultimate Tensile Strength | 950 MPa | 1,275 MPa |
| Yield Strength (0.2%) | 880 MPa | 1,034 MPa |
| Max Service Temperature | 400°C | 700°C |
| Thermal Conductivity | 6.7 W/m·K | 11.4 W/m·K |
| Modulus of Elasticity | 114 GPa | 200 GPa |
| Hardness | 36 HRC | 40-44 HRC |
| Relative Machinability | Moderate | Difficult |
| Relative Cost | $$ | $$$$ |
Mechanical Properties
Ti-6Al-4V Advantages
- 85% better strength-to-weight ratio (tensile/density)
- Lower density (4.43 vs 8.19 g/cm³) — 46% lighter
- Excellent corrosion resistance
Inconel 718 Advantages
- 34% higher tensile strength (1,275 vs 950 MPa)
- Service temperature to 700°C vs 400°C
- Higher modulus (200 vs 114 GPa) — stiffer
Manufacturability
| Aspect | Ti-6Al-4V | Inconel 718 |
|---|---|---|
| Machinability | Moderate | Difficult to Very Difficult |
| Recommended Tooling | Carbide (AlTiN coated) | Ceramic or carbide (TiAlN coated) |
| Cutting Speed (milling) | 40-90 m/min | 20-40 m/min |
| Work Hardening | Moderate | Severe |
| Coolant | Required (70+ bar) | Required (high pressure) |
Cost Analysis
| Factor | Ti-6Al-4V | Inconel 718 |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Material (per kg) | $$ | $$$$ |
| Machining Time | Baseline | 2-3x longer |
| Tool Wear | Moderate | High (frequent tool changes) |
Recommended Applications
Choose Ti-6Al-4V When
- Weight reduction is critical (airframe structures, aerospace)
- Service temperature is below 400°C
- Corrosion resistance in seawater or chemical environments
- Cost is a consideration
Choose Inconel 718 When
- Operating temperature exceeds 400°C
- Creep resistance is required at high temperatures
- Extreme strength is needed at temperature
- Highly corrosive + high-temperature environments
Selection Decision Framework
If temperature > 400°C → Inconel 718If weight reduction critical → Ti-6Al-4VIf maximum strength at temperature → Inconel 718If cost-sensitive → Ti-6Al-4VIf cryogenic application → Ti-6Al-4VIf creep resistance at 700°C → Inconel 718Related Standards
- Ti-6Al-4V: ASTM B265, ASTM B348, AMS 4928
- Inconel 718: AMS 5662, AMS 5663, ASTM B637